♡ 25 ( +1 | -1 ) After 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 Bc4 5. Bxf7+ is the better capture on f7. After 5. Nxf7:
6. Kxf2 Nxe4+ 7. Kg1 Qh4 15. h3 (15. g3 Qf6 is dangerous for White) Qf2+ draw (at least, Black can choose to play on and press an attack) 6. Kf1 Qe7 7. Nxh8 d5 8. exd5 Nd4 9. d6 cxd6 10. c3 Bg4 11. Qa4+ Kf8 with a draw in most continuations.
♡ 141 ( +1 | -1 ) Wilkes-Barre/Traxler linesNot sure if there's been any new theory, but I think Black can do better than caldazar's suggestions. The first line appears to be mixed up with a 6. Kf1 line, since it jumps from move 7 to move 15 :) 8. g3 is universally regarded as better than 8. h3, after which Black's attack is overwhelming, and 8... Nxg3 is a better response than 8... Qf6. However, Black still gets a draw, at the least; Nunn gives 8... Nxg3 9. Nxh8 d5 10. Qf3 Nf5!-/+.
The line which caldazar is probably referring to is 6. Kf1 Qe7 7. Nxh8 d5 8. exd5 Nd4 9. d6 cxd6 10. c3 Bg4 11. Qa4+ Kf8 (not sure how this is assessed as a draw, most sources give it as a Black win) 12. cxd4 exd4 13. Kxf2 Ne4+ 14. Kg1 Qh4 15. h3 (when 15. g3 Qf6 leads to mate), and Black gets perpetual check after 15... Qf2+ 16. Kh2 Qg3+ 17. Kg1 Qf2+ etc. But better is 17... Bf3 18. Bf1 Ng5!!, when Black is winning (Engelhardt-Eckmann, 1984, which continued 19. Qd7 Bxg2 20. Qf5+ Kg8 21. Bxg2 Re8 0-1. Amazingly enough, Andre-Schneider, 1986 was drawn after the inferior 20... Ke7?? 21. Bxg2 Rf8 22. Qxf8+ Kxf8 23. Kf1 Qd3+?? 24. Kf2 1/2-1/2, when White avoids perpetual check and has a winning material advantage, and Andre-Knorr, 1986 was drawn after 16... Qg3+).
All of this is generally moot since the 5. Bxf7+ lines leave White with a clear edge, e.g. 5... Ke7 6. Bb3 (6. Bd5 is less clear) Rf8 7. 0-0 d6 8. Nc3 Qe8 9. Nd5+ Kd8 10. c3 h6 11. d4 exd4 12. Nxf6 Rxf6 13. e5 when White has a clear, if slight advantage.
♡ 10 ( +1 | -1 ) Boys! You are discussing game what is in progress! And in the position just in discussion point! IT'S UNETHICAL!
♡ 9 ( +1 | -1 ) atrifixinteresting you say black has the edge in the 5. Nxf7 lines. MCO-14 has them as drawish. Is it wrong here?
♡ 4 ( +1 | -1 ) loreta!note that we are not discussing the b4 lines---
♡ 39 ( +1 | -1 ) Dear loretaopening discussion is not unethical, because opening theory is general, and not related to a specific game. And it's available in many written sources elsewhere, anyway. Consider that in the world, right now thousands and thousands of correspondence games are played, so , from your standpoint, any discussion like "Do you prefer King's pawn opening or Queen's pawn?" would be unethical :)
♡ 39 ( +1 | -1 ) I'm not sure who has the last word in the 5. Nxf7 lines, but personally I've had very good experience with them. IMO the move is extremely dubious, since 5. Bxf7+ leads to a much easier position.
And, yes, it's just opening theory. You can't really abandon opening theory without abandoning chess discussion altogether. And the comments were not even related to the line played in the game :)